 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Marginal Adaptation Of Compomer/Composite "Sandwich" Fillings In Class II Cavities |
| M. Kahl*, B. Bott, M. Hannig |
| (Clinic Of Operative Dentistry And Periodontology, University Of Kiel, Germany) |
 |
The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyse the marginal adaptation of Class II sandwich restorations using low-viscosity compomers in combination with composite resins (according to the CbC-technique; Hannig et al. 1997). Thirty Class II cavities with the proximal box ending 1 mm beyond the CEJ were prepared in extracted human molars and randomly assigned to five groups with six teeth each. The following dentin bonding agents / low-viscosity compomer materials were applied up to the level of the cemento-enamel junction: Ecusit Primer AB -Mono / Prima Flow (Group I), Syntac sprint / Compoglass Flow (Group II), Syntac classic after total etching of the cavity with phosphoric acid / Compoglass Flow (Group III), Syntac classic / Compoglass Flow (Group IV), and NRC, Prime & Bond NT / Dyract Flow (Group V).
Subsequently, all cavities were filled with a fine-hybrid composite resin (Ecusit) using the incremental technique. SEM-analysis of the marginal adaptation of the restorations after thermocycling (5-55 °C, 2,500 cycles) and mechanical loading (100 N, 500,000 cycles) revealed that excellent, gap-free marginal integrity (mean / median percentages) was achieved in 87.2% / 89.0% (Group I), 57.2% / 53.0% (Group II), 62.0% / 55.0% (Group III), 70.0% / 92.5% (Group IV), and 55.8% / 54.0% (Group V) of the marginal areas located in dentin.
Statistical analysis (H-test according to Kruskal and Wallis; p < 0.05) did not indicate significant differences in percentages of gap-free marginal adaptation between the various groups. Results indicate that use of the material combination tested in Groups I and IV provided high levels of perfect marginal adaptation in Class II cavities with proximal margins located in dentin. However, a completely gap-free marginal seal at the critical dentinal margins of Class II cavities could not be obtained with the low-viscosity compomer / composite "sandwich restorations evaluated in this study.
|
|
 |
 |
|